Creative Financial

Bank of England steadies the ship

Bank of England steadies the ship by pledging £250 Billion liquidity

The Bank of England has set aside an additional £250 billion of liquidity and said it ‘will not hesitate to act’ to support the economy in the wake of the shock Brexit vote. In a statement, governor Mark Carney stressed that the Bank had ‘extensive contingency planning’ in place and he had been in discussions with chancellor George Osborne throughout the night.

Carney also moved to reassure about the banking sector, which has been battered upon the news with Barclays down 23% and Royal Bank of Scotland 18% at 8:54am.

‘The Bank of England has stress-tested these banks against scenarios far worse than the one the UK is facing,’ he said. ‘We will provide additional funds of £250 billion and the Bank of England will also be able to provide institutions with forex if required.’

Carney noted that the banking sector has raised £130 billion in fresh capital since he has been in the post and is sitting on £600 billion of ‘high quality liquid assets’.

He added that the bank will continue to ‘monitor the economy closely’ and ‘won’t hesitate to act’ if needed.

Remember Interest rates can still go down by 0.5% to a zero base rate.

James Phillipps (2016) Bank of England pledges £250bn liquidity. Available at: http://citywire.co.uk

The bank of Mum & Dad
It has been reported that two-thirds of first-time buyers would be unable to afford a home without help. Typically, they buy at aged 30 and put down a 17% deposit (on average £26,000). So, depending on how many children you have, that could amount to an awful lot of money being passed down to your children in the form of property.

Whilst gifting to your children during your lifetime can be an excellent way to reduce your inheritance tax liability (provided you live for seven years after the gift), it would be reckless to do so without exploring the protection that could be put in place for your money.

A Beneficiary Protection Trust is one of the most efficient ways of protecting assets passed to your children, either during your lifetime or on your death. Although you still have to abide by the seven-year rule for gifting (so no IHT benefit until further through the generations), it provides invaluable protection against such things as divorce, bankruptcy or any other claims on your children’s estate.

Whilst you may not see such things as divorce or bankruptcy – or indeed any claim against your children – on the horizon, it does not mean that these events may not occur in the future. By putting such protection in place now, you, as well as your children, are saved any future battles with ex-partners or banks over the gifts you may make to help with first-time house purchases. In the eyes of the law, once money has been given as an outright gift to your children, you have no further claim to it and so it could easily be lost in a number of future circumstances.

If you would like further information about Beneficiary Protection Trusts, please call the office and we will be more than happy to help.

Joint Tenants versus Tenants in Common
The majority of you will be aware of the difference in these terms in relation to property ownership, but for those of you who are not, a quick reminder. Joint Tenancy is where you each own the whole property, which means that when one of you dies their half of the house automatically passes to the spouse – that is the law, no arguing. Tenants in Common is where you each own an identifiable percentage of the property (it could be a 50/50 split or an unequal portion), which means that when one of you dies, the deceased’s share of the property will pass according to the deceased’s Will.

If we have set up Discretionary Settlements for you (which we have done for the majority of you), we will have changed your property title to be held as Tenants in Common. Therefore, on first death, half of the property is available to be passed into your Settlement for future protection – be that from future remarriage, care-home fees or potential inheritance tax savings.

If you move house, the default for your solicitor will normally be to select the ownership of the property as Joint Tenancy. It is vital that you ensure any new property is held as Tenants in Common if you have Discretionary Settlements, as otherwise this important Estate Planning cannot be used to its full advantage. The entire property will pass to the surviving spouse and half of the property will not be available to be used in your trust arrangements. In most circumstances this could be rectifiable; however, not purchasing any new property as Tenants in Common would result in additional legal fees of up to £1,500 or more which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions on this or want to learn more about Discretionary Settlements, how they work and what the advantages are, then please get in touch.

Should I overpay my mortgage?
This is a common dilemma for those with disposable income: do they squirrel it away in a savings account or pay more off their mortgage to become free of one of the biggest debts they have during their lifetime?

With interest rates so low it would definitely be preferable to overpay on your mortgage rather than keep your savings in a low-interest cash savings account. Your mortgage rate is no doubt currently at one of the lowest levels it ever has been, so if you overpay at 5% you will save yourself interest and reduce the length of the mortgage by a good few years. By overpaying you will also protect yourself against a shock to your expenditure when interest rates do eventually rise.

The pros and cons of this would obviously need to be considered in relation to your circumstances, as there is no right or wrong answer. There are also other options that may be more beneficial: instead of overpaying on your mortgage, you could pay into your pension if you are able to, as this will receive tax relief from the government. Also, there is no guarantee that your mortgage provider will allow you to underpay if you run into financial difficulty and need access to the additional cash – property is obviously less accessible than cash or investment savings. Obviously investment savings should stay as investment savings.

Easy switching … coming soon
It has been reported recently that it will become much easier to switch such things as your mortgage to alternative providers than is currently the case. You will all have struggled to switch providers in the past, and not necessarily your mortgage provider – just attempting to switch your TV package becomes a battle of wills with certain providers!

New government plans will give homeowners the legal right to switch mortgage providers within seven days – an improvement on the current switching timescales, which on average are about two months. This means people will be better able to take advantage of lower-priced deals with other providers. This move is designed to bring the mortgage market more in line with energy, broadband, phone and bank account switching, the rules for which were revised recently.

There are concerns that it will encourage irresponsible lending, as there may be insufficient time to carry out the appropriate checks. Whilst this is obviously an important consideration, a reduction in the time it takes to process mortgage switching applications would be indispensable to ensure that customers benefit from better deals and are not locked in a paperwork battle for months on end.

No plans have yet been finalised so who knows if this will come to fruition, but fingers crossed.

France vs Google
As I am sure we are all aware, Google are notoriously bad at paying their taxes! In fact, in 2014 they paid France just 5 million Euros in tax from their 225.4 million Euro revenue. Something doesn’t quite add up there!

Well, France are not taking it, and are turning up the heat in the tax war against the technology giants. An early-morning raid by 25 data experts was carried out on Google’s Paris office at the end of May. This raid was part of a much larger ongoing investigation into Google’s tax affairs in an attempt to crack down on their aggressive tax avoidance schemes. A previous raid was carried out in 2011 as part of an investigation similar to the one going on now.

It is reported that France is aiming to claim back 1.6 billion Euros in backdated tax, starting from 2005. It is not only France who has issues with Google: Italy, Australia and the UK have all previously argued with them about the dismal tax payments they make in relation to their huge profits.

It is a hard fight to take on against such a large corporation, so kudos to France for persevering. Let’s hope they are successful in ensuring the tax that is due, is paid.

Beware – unauthorised investment schemes
It would seem that the pension freedoms introduced last year are making it increasingly easier for unregulated investment schemes to target the over 55s. It is reported that, since the new rules were announced, nearly 5 million people over the age of 55 have paid into unregulated investment schemes that are basically doomed to fail.

Those taking advantage of this will normally be selling high-risk investments, such as land, diamonds and wine, which are specifically aimed at older savers with new flexible access to their pension funds. Of these schemes, 75% will lose money, and the odds of getting any kind of return are pretty slim. The risks are extremely high that all of the money will be lost, and investors will also be subjected to “secret fees” of up to 20% that they conveniently forget to advise you of.

Although not all unregulated investments are based on scams, the majority of them will be unsuitable for investors such as us, not only because of the reasons given above but also because they are not insured by the FSCS, meaning you have no comeback if you lose your entire savings. In contrast, regulated investments are insured by the FSCS up to £50,000 per investment fund.

Stay alert and be sensible; the main thing to keep in mind is that if it sounds too good to be true, then it probably is. And if you are still not sure, then let us know.

Past performance is not a reliable guide to the future.
The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up.
The value of tax reliefs depend upon individual circumstances and tax rules may change.
Tax and Estate Planning Services are not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
This newsletter is for general information purposes only and is not advice.
All information contained is believed to be correct at the time of writing.
Speak to an Independent Financial Adviser for advice before making any decisions.